Analysis

The case presents a very distressing dilemma for Charles Rangel . The unalike facts outlined in the case decisively point towards the wellhead-educated ignorance by Rangel . However before a conclusion toilette be made decisively , it is important to analyze and envision the charges press against Rangel and evaluate them criticallyRangel is chrged with several types of breaches : missing personal income taskes , distress to reputation proper(ip)ties and their details in more than one calculate , chastisement to report rentals received from property not divulge and sport in any(prenominal) discontinued entries that suggest each creativity br or lack of information with the preparing control . These charges be touch onto Rangel , who claims that he has not committed any intentional bollocks up or attempted to hide a nything from the eyeball of the police specialty he accepts himself some of his tax liabilities and is willing to study an hearer to review his financial position as well as disclose his personal tax returns for the past 20 years - a bold step towards proving himself innocentWhatever the case may be , the accounting principles and regulations dictate that some of the mistakes he did cannot be unknowing . For example , the change of property value from page-to-page and year-to-year may be technical errors however , accountants , by profession atomic fig 18 required to verify the disputations before release . and then the released statements are then considerd to be honourable and on-key by the law . Any mistake therefore in the statement is state to be intentional .

Furthermore , property manifestation and the failure to report rentals over the years suggests the sheer ignorance and sloth of Rangel in reconciling proper financial disclosure . The unfitness to disclose cannot be attributed to an `error of ommisson always (Barrett ) There has to be some sort of intentional ommission or else the volume of errors would be advantageously lowerIn conclusion , I would like to state that Rangel s fashion was super unprofessional and careless , considering the fact that he was a tax accountant . His carelessness and the inability to disclose true and proper financial dealings renders him incapable of heading the sign ways and Means Committee and providing true service to itWorks CitedBarrett , D (n .d . more(prenominal) Errors for Rangel To Hire New Accountant Retrieved September 16 , 2008 , from SmartPros .com hypertext gu ide protocol /accounting .smartpros .com /x63240 .xml...If you want to get a sufficient essay, value it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay