'Critical Evaluation of the Cognitive Theory of Stereotyping '

'decisive Evaluation of the cognitive Theory of Stereotyping\n\nB231: favorable Interaction, Exam musical composition 1998, Question 4.\n\nGraeme Gordon\n\nStereotyping is a form of pre belief that is as prevailing in todays troupe as it was 2000 historic period ago. It is a accessible attitude that has stood the screen of time and accepted much financial aid by tender psychologists and philosophers alike. M whatever approaches to, or theories of stereotyping have so been raised. This move evaluates the cognitive approach that categorization is an essential cognitive process that unavoidably leads to stereotyping. Hamilton (1979) c each(prenominal)s this a depressing dilemma.\n\nBr witnesss (1995) description of stereotyping through with(predicate) preconceived belief is the holding of derogatory amicable attitudes or cognitive beliefs, the expression of forbid affect, or the uncover of hostile or discriminatory demeanour towards segments of a separate on me asure of their membership to that chemical collection. This exposition implies that stereotyping is primarily a free radical process, through the individuals psyches within that group. A further idea of stereotyping, defined by Allport (1954) as thinking failure of new(prenominal)s without warrant, is that people make their thinker up without any own(prenominal) experience. This pre popular opinion round a altogether group is thusly transferred to the stigmatisation of any individuals in that group. It is these ideas that the essay aims to evaluate, through the cognitive process of categorization and the above definitions that necessitate about triad distinct features of stereotyping, that our erudition can be demonstrated through.\n\nThe world-class symptomatic of stereotyping is over-generalisation. A number of studies conducted demonstrate that distinguishable combinations of traits were associated with groups of different ethnic and interior(a) origin (Katz and Braly, 1933). However, stereotyping does non imply that all members of a group are judged in these ways, just that a typical member of a group can be categorised in much(prenominal) judgements, that they make the characteristics of the group. Still, when we talk of a group, we do so by imagining a member of that group.\n\nThe secondment feature and characteristic of stereotyping is the exaggeration of the deviance between ones own group (the in-group) and the other group (the out-group). This can be traced back to the produce of Tajfel during the 1950s - the accentuation principle (Tajfel, 1981). Tajfels cultivate was specifically on physical stimuli, and reason out that judgements on such stimuli are not made in isolation, but in the context of other factors. Applied socially - a judgement about an...If you insufficiency to get a full essay, arrangement it on our website:

Top quality Cheap custom essays - BestEssayCheap. Our expert essay writers guarantee re markable quality with 24/7. If you are not good enough at writing and expressing your ideas on a topic... You want to get good grades? Hire them ... Best Essay Cheap - High Quality for Affordable Price'